-------------------------------------------------------------

June 10th, 2025

Have I renounced libertarianism or otherwise classical liberalism? As of this date, June 10th, 2025, I cannot be sure. I have grown weary of proclaiming the Founding Fathers or John Locke had any particular divine insight or study into the words of God, and thus I am unsure if they are trustworthy sources on morality, if we indeed presuppose that God exists, and acts as the source of morality and reason, then I see not the utility in pursuing the libertarian ideals as moral policy. Perhaps as pleasantry, and selectively implied in utility, such as market freedom and no imposed taxation, but I have increasingly become more partial to the ideas of medieval human rights as defined by Thomas Aquinas, as a more theologically and morally sound menagerie of principles held evident as the rights of family, of truth, and of the pursuit of God, freely, and justly. Does this entail libertarian life, liberty, and property are incorrect? Not at all, but perhaps may be subordinate to the order composed by Aquinas. Of course, I am so thoroughly convinced of the truth of Jesus Christ, and I am so nihilistic beyond this point, and I affirm that no secular morality exists, and nothing abstract or moral exists autonomously of God, and so with that, it is paramount to ensure just civil codes are truly just, and not the arbitary musings and assertions of fallible humans. And so, the leaders have this moral obligation to uphold these rights of mankind, as defined in a rather Thomist manner. All humans possess these rights, and they must be upheld, lest the sovereigns of our civilization face judgement, or otherwise moral indictment. And the preservation of these rights is an imperative for the sovereigns of this moral teaching, and in this sense, they must do all to preserve this civilization. However, core principles shall be affirmed: taxation is indeed theft, and not permissible by any arm of the state. Markets are the best means of economic allocation and fairness. The right to keep and to bear arms is wholly just in national preservation. Of course, there is still debates to be waged and won, such as the matters of historiography, governance, and other matters of sociology and political science. I do not wish to say I have abandoned libertarianism, rather, I have evolved with philosophical clarity, and moral realism. Perhaps fusionism, or some kind of economically rigntward paleoconservatism is the better label for this evolution. I have never thought the "NAP" was some kind of moral imperative, as it seemed so invented by men, and not at all of any moral binding, and so I had always deferred to the mild theism of the Declaration of Independance, which seems so faulty at the moment, and so I have moved rightwards to further traditionalism, and I have sought to reconcile these ideas of religion and libertarianism, which I could do no more, as I realize that only God is capable of dictating morality, and it is not the prerogative of mere men to construct morality, and so, I no longer shall defer to this DOI, but instead to the writings of Thomas Aquinas in the affirmation of human rights.

Respectfully~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

September 19th, 2025

As of this date, September 19th, 2025, I have been attending a Greek Orthodox church for more than 3 months at this point, and I have been so publicly dedicated to being an Orthodox Christian. I have renounced all forms of liberalism in favor of Christianity and monarchy. By "monarchy", I prescribe the literal rule of one, "mon-", him being subordinate to the Church, totally, dependent upon the Church for all manner of legitimacy and morality.

Righteously~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

February 5th, 2026

I am a Christian! Praise the only true, living God, Jesus Christ, for His generosity in endowing me faith in Him so I may participate in Him to attain eternal life.

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Joyously~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

June 22nd, 2026

Right now, I've just been listening to pop greatest hits (Wham!, Michael Jackson, ABBA, you know the types), as well as punk, though mostly No Fun at All. I really have grown disinterested in the genre-purism once heralded. I was, and still am, deeply interested in black metal and melodic death metal, though I just find myself burnt out with it all, and currently listen to whatever I care to. Especially Michael Jackson, Thriller and HIStory, but also the Stranglers, the Who, really going back to basics in music, just pop and rock hits. That's real punk right there, rebelling against the obscure in that regard. Though I say that more ironically, because I do like obscure music, mostly EdelweiSS, VampyreSS, Black Magick SS, Mystery (BMSS), Curta'n Wall, Fugitive Wizard, Goatmoon, GutterSkull, Keys to the Astral Gates and Mystic Doors, Kekht Arakh, and all that stuff I'm listing to be a showoff about my edgy, underground tastes. But I haven't listened to them in recent months, though I'm listening to a GutterSkull EP as I write this, admittedly. Though I had just become bored with it all.

Cordially~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

June 22nd, 2026

I find that the Brown Scapular reflects antinomianism, at least superficially, does it not? "Whosoever dies clothed in this Scapular shall not suffer eternal fire.", that seems to be plain antinomianism. It is as antinomian as it is magickal, it seems, as it presents an object as being imbued or endowed with some kind of power, a power which only God can hold, that of judgement.

Curiously~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

June 23rd, 2026

Went to see Masters of the Universe (2026) in theaters. After watching the film in theaters, it was this monstrous film saturated with excessive irony, self awareness, and subversive humor ("you didn't expect that to happen, huh?!" humor, not moral degen nonsense disguised as humor, aka "subversive humor"). The film, from the beginning, didn't take itself too seriously, and Cringer was portrayed as a coward --to be fair, in the show, Cringer was fearful of becoming Battle Cat, but it wasn't played as a joke or cowardice like it is here--, as was He-Man, who was depicted as a pansy faggot. I did enjoy the satirizing of leftist-adjacent office politics, though I actually disliked its place in the film, as I felt it only contributed to the films many deficiencies, even though I agree that pronoun policing is retarded, I don't believe it belongs in this film, or rather I don't think anything contemporary should incur upon this film, as it detracts from the fantasy, and I would say dates the film, whether that be the negress at HR who leads Adam around by his castrated stump for testicles, or whether it be... well come to think of it, that's the only thing which really dates the film, just the politics/ideology, nothing more. It's a very milquetoast satire of left-wing office talk, though would be welcomed in any other film I were watching, but not Masters of the Universe. I dislike that Earth was a setting. I feel that Earth should have never even penetrated the script, yet modern-day Earth finds itself pervading Adam's life and surmounting his will, making him a rather unmasculine figure. I did like Teela's actress, Camila Mendes, though she does not fit as Idris Elba's daughter. At the end of the film, for some odd reason, Queen Marlena wears the crown of King Randor. Why? Why not Prince Adam becoming the new king, succeeding his father, and galivanting around the universe, saving the innocent peoples of the vast cosmos as a sort of warrior-king? Also, why didn't Skeletor seem to care all that much when the Sword of Power was destroyed? That was literally the whole point of his quest, to retrieve the sword, and he's just okay with it being destroyed now? That's literally all he was after, and he doesn't allocate much mind to its destruction, at his own hand no less? Like the speech in Adam's bedroom, about the power actually being le inside Adam all along snark snark occurred only after he was stabbed with the broken Sword of Power, and so one cannot explain Skeletor's sudden change of attitude towards the Sword as realizing that the power is really just inside you anyway, and all that horseshit, alongside Adam, that wouldn't work, because Skeletor would only have the opportunity to know this after the Sword was already broken. So why didn't Skeletor care about the broken Sword? Besides that, everyone in the theater was giggling like a monkey at every little thing, and laughing like spastics, as if they were only mouths, just giant mouths that torment me with their laughter. Maybe I'm just weird, but I am hard to laughter, and I do not laugh very much, and laughter feels so performative, and so being inundated with the laughter of humanimals, subhumans, it was all so irritating to me. I found myself quite irritated in the theater. Are the laughniks capable of speech? Upright walking? Or anything beyond the groans of beings whose brain is but a vestige of an evolution which has long since antiquated their brains, leaving these flesh-machines in the hands of demons who had influenced my actions all my life just to lead me to this moment, sitting in a theater, molested by inescapable laughter? Yeesh. I hated it. Of course, I speak in hyperbole to illustrate my experience. The serious moments were always accompanied by a detrimental quip. Detrimental to the seriousness, that is. If only there were another Bayformers, those films, at least Dark of the Moon, my favorite among them, were taken seriously, both by the writers, by Michael Bay, and by the public, a luxury not afforded to 2026's Masters of the Universe, which is just Hollywood slop, as per usual, it seems. Marvel-level humor, Marvel tropes, absolute shit for a film. I hated it. I will never watch Masters of the Universe (2026) ever again.

Frightfully~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

June 26th, 2026

There is no "replacement theology" for the Church is, and always has been, Israel in total continuity with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Christians are Israel whose truest king, God, has come to save us and restore communion, and truly, the Crucifixion is the most important even in the history of Israel, nay, the world, for all things are created through Him and by Him, Jesus Christ. It is in fact the medieval project of Rabbinic Judaism which is the divergent Edom to Christendom. Those Jews who reject the very God of Jacob who had come to save His people, and the whole of mankind, they are spiritual Edom, the brothers who rejected God. The only means for Edom's salvation is to become the spiritual heirs of Abraham, just as every Christian is. That is the matter for the salvation of all nations, for the Lord Jesus is most merciful and forgiving, and shall forgive those who bind themselves to Him and worshipping Him. All who are forgiven shall inherit the Kingdom, and those who are forgiven are His people, they are Israel. Those who haven't known Him shall not inherit the Kingdom, and those who reject Him are spiritually Edomite. To be saved, one must participate in Him, and those who have not participated in Him will experience His omnipresent Love as eternal fire in their personal separation from the one Lord Jesus Christ.

Righteously~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

July 6th, 2026

I mean think about it, prior to Abraham, effectively nobody follower God, and it was only the prophets who knew God. Thus, God creating His people is such an immense act of love to mankind that He would establish the apparatus by which everyone may have this central Kingdom to know God through. Of course, nothing is achieved without Jesus' providence, will, and permission, and His people are one in Him in a spiritual sense of participation, and their hearts have been soft before Christ, and shall experience His eternal love with the very joy and ecstasy he had desired, while those whom had separated shall have hardened their hearts, and shall experience His eternal, omnipresent love as fires due to their own passions and wills which defy Christ's love. Indeed, modern Jews are pagans. Lurianic-Kabbalah? Magick is forbidden for God's people, for it communes with demons, thus separates one from God and brings one into hellfires. The Jews, Edom, are known to be false claimants, like Samaritans in their eyes. Abraham's seed was never strictly genealogical, and the heirs of Abraham are brought up before all nations, so to suggest that there were those who are these sort of cosmic husks formed from preexistent evil that caused all of this sin in the world, and who are in opposition to His people, it is a total rejection of Scripture. The dualism is quite troubling in Edom, as dualism only exists at the expense of pure monotheism, which the patriarchs had known, and which Jesus had always taught. Evil cannot be a force on its lonesome, but the act of beings, demons, and humans of free will who can consciously rebel against God, rather than being some energy or disruptive force that can somehow insurrect aspects of God's perfect creative ability through this "shattering of vessels". Even implying God must change to create, this is very demeaning to our Father.

Righteously~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

July 7th, 2026

I had been watching the otherwise great film, 2005's V for Vendetta, and during the imprisonment of Evey, and her discovery of a letter V supplied her from the wall, recounting the grotesque homosexual fantasies of the filmmakers, I could not help but realize the poor logic used. First and foremost, why feel full and happy? Why not aspire for incompleteness and sadness? Though this reflects a modern fetishism for hedonistic activities, to which it is apparent from the valorization of such an unholy lifestyle. The nonsense "only her lips", or whatever the phrase was, could be equally applied to human genocide and slavery, that "it was then I knew, I was happiest when I was enslaving the world, and it was only mankind I wished to slaughter", the fact of the matter being that both lifestyles, the pillaging True Tyrant and the homosexual captive in Larkhill are both immoral people, though this is not to undermine the immorality of the un-Christian liars of Norsefire, as much as their rhetoric is seemingly, at least, partially Christian, Prothero's misuse of the name "God", and the anti-Americanism, or just lack of pastoralism in general, it is all so un-Christian. Let alone the fact that Chancellor Sutler is not even a Christian! But an idolater, and a secular fascist in the comics. But, I digress: the Evey prison sequence is utterly without meaning, and is the sentimentality of the immoral, and not something to aspire for. Though otherwise, I quite liked V for Vendetta about as much as I liked Waterworld. Though I ought to say it for the record that if the matter is simply a matter of agony, then indeed, hellfires are much worse than mere personal pain. That is what pleasure-cult is! It is the pursuit of these material things which are so mutable and accessible via innumerable means, while God is one, and accessible only through the Church. Praise be to the one Lord Jesus Christ!

Critically~ P. Michael Amedeo

-------------------------------------------------------------

If you are expecting some kind of personal page, you would be better in seeing my SolidWorks models, job application printouts, and screenshots, which you may readily find here.